Despite Rulings In Colorado, Washington, Medical Marijuana Still A Legal Risk In Arizona

A cannabis-infused fizzy drink, called Legal, is being marketed as a gentler alternative to smoking that could be attractive to those still wary about cannabis.

ARIZONA: You may have a state-issued card allowing you to buy and use marijuana for medical purposes.

But the state’s top health official warned Friday that medical marijuana soda pop or hard candy you bought may still land you — and the dispensary owner who sold it to you — in jail.

State Health Director Will Humble said the 2010 voter-approved law clearly contemplates that those authorized to sell and use marijuana for medical reasons need not smoke it. Food products are legal.

But Humble cautioned that the law is crafted to require that the food products contain actual pieces of the marijuana plant. He said anything that contains only an extract remains a felony in Arizona.

Humble said he’s not an attorney and cannot define exactly when preparing marijuana for brownies, sodas or lollipops crosses the line. But he said the statute is very clear that only “useable marijuana’ is legally protected and not the extracts minus the plant.

What that means, he said, is someone with a medical marijuana card could legally make, sell or possess a tea bag with marijuana. But selling — or even possessing — the brewed tea in a bottle, with no plant material, could be a felony.

Attorney Ryan Hurley, whose clients include dispensary owners, acknowledged that Arizona law does make a difference between marijuana as defined in the 2010 law and what he called an “archaic’ definition of marijuana extracts that are illegal under the criminal code. And he conceded the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act does not include extracts.

But Hurley said he believes it was always the intent of those who crafted the law to allow food products made from extracts.

That’s also the contention of Morgan Fox, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project which crafted the Arizona law. He said the statute allows use of not only marijuana but also any “preparation’ of the drug, which he said includes extracts.

“I have no doubt that the state will be challenged if it tries to exclude edible marijuana products from protection,’ he said.

By contrast, Jeffrey Kaufman, who also represents dispensary owners, said the issue may come down to how the THC — the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana — was extracted.

On one hand, he said it’s illegal to make hashish or hash oil, the concentrated resins containing the THC, using a butane extraction process. And that would make any food products made with those items illegal.

But Kaufman said he believes there’s nothing wrong with extracting THC through a freezing and filtering process and then using what’s produced in recipes.

Humble isn’t ready to make that kind of distinction, calling it one of the “gray areas’ in the law. But he said state health inspectors will soon be taking a closer look at the recipes of the food products being sold at marijuana dispensaries and advising operators when they think the items are not protected by the law.

The 2010 laws says those with a doctor’s recommendation can get 2 1/2 ounces of “useable marijuana’ every two weeks. And the law defines that as being the plant, minus the stems and seeds.

But the criminal code has two definitions.

The first is for “marijuana’ which includes the plant “from which the resin has not been extracted.’ But there is a separate definition of “cannabis’ which includes the resin extracted from the plant.

And Humble said the 2010 law did not legalize cannabis.

“You can produce edibles,’ he said. “But you’d better make sure it’s made of ‘useable marijuana’ as covered under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act and not extracts and resins’ which remain illegal under the state’s criminal code.

The problem is where to draw that line.

“Hashish is clearly a resin or extract,’ Humble said, and not protected under the medical marijuana law. But he said that, in making food products, there be “a shade of gray that’s up to somebody’s interpretation of the law.’

“What we’re trying to do is to let folks know to stay away from those shades of gray because it could be problematic for them,’ Humble said.

“Avoid using extracts in your recipes and stick to what you believe is ‘useable marijuana’ as defined under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act,’ he continued. “If you can do that, you’re probably going to be OK.’

Humble said the initial offerings at the approximately 80 dispensaries now open were pretty much limited to various varieties of the flowers and leaves of marijuana plants.

Read full article @ Michigan Medical Marijuana

Comments

  1. Charles Waller says

    Someone needs to explain to the officials in Arizona that trichomes (resin glands) ARE BOTANICALLY PART IF THE PLANT. Extracted cannabinoids from the resin glands would qualify as not part of the plant, or “refined” from plant components. Trichomes are structural parts of the plant. Historically hash was considered different from cannabis because it was often combined with opium poppy extract, which is not a structural part of that plant. Amazing that poppies can be cultivated ornamentally while every subspecies, variety and extract of cannabis is prohibited because of cannabinoid content. Yet synthetic cannabinoids have twice been approved for medical use and US DHHS has held patent #6630507, cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants, since 2003. NIH-OTT licensed KannaLife Sciences last year to produce cannabinoid based medicinal products under that patent, while cannabis remains on Schedule 1. There is no rational reason for this situation except to prevent personal cultivation anf force people to pay through the nose for the therapeutic benefits of cannabinoids – and guarantee corporate profits. Prohibition kills, pot heals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>